President Gerald R. Ford (1974-1977) told us his original long form birth certificate SECRETS!
The book, "The Last Cow on the White House Lawn" by Barbara Seuling, page 85:
"Gerald Ford did not know that he was adopted until he was sixteen. Ford was born Leslie Lynch King, Jr. When he was two, his parents divorced and his mother later married Gerald Rudolff Ford, who legally adopted the boy and gave him his name. The secret was kept from him until his high school years, when his real father came up to him one day and announced the facts."
Now, if President Barack Hussein Obama is a natural born citizen, then it is impossible for an African man to be his biological father.
However emotionally trying it will be, it is time for President Barack Hussein Obama to show us his original long form birth certificate with the name of the attending physician and the name of the hospital he was born in, or taxi cab and driver certifying back seat delivery.
President Obama is claiming to be a natural born citizen which requires two American biological birth parents. On the birth certificate his campaign claims is his, there is no medical doctor listed as being present at birth and no hospital listed, and the father listed is African; therefore, the facts presented prove that President Barack Hussein Obama is not a natural born citizen.
If President Obama is a natural born citizen, then Barack Obama Sr. could not have been his biological father.
How many Black children in America know who their biological father is?
It will not tear President Obama apart from his supporters, but only bring him closer if he shares with us the truth.
Send comments to crisericson@aceweb.com
Analyze the available facts in relationship to applicable Laws.
Obama C.O.L.B., SEE LEGAL NOTICE in the lower right hand corner: [HRS 338-13(b), 338-19]
![Obama C.O.L.B., SEE LEGAL NOTICE in the lower right hand corner: [HRS 338-13(b), 338-19]](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_1FW8LDRBjCM/SaihKk84zkI/AAAAAAAAACw/jFJ9AYLLl2E/S1600-R/certification+of+live+birth+OBAMA.JPG)
No hospital listed, no doctor listed, no witness listed, dated (Rev. 11/01) which proves he received it after 9/11. Birth Aug. 4, filed w/ Registrar Aug. 8, 1961. What took him over 40 years to get this? See Legal Notice in lower right hand corner of applicable statutes: [HRS 338-13(b), 338-19]
HRS 338-13(b) HAWAII REVISED STATUTES
HRS 338-13(b) is subject to the requirements of 338-16, 338-17 and 338-18.
HRS 338-16 Hawaii Revised Statutes
"Birth certificates registered ONE YEAR OR MORE AFTER THE DATE OF BIRTH, and certificates which have been ALTERED.
HRS 338-17
Definition of "Late" is a birth registered with Hawaii ONE YEAR OR MORE after birth.
HRS 338-19 unConstitutionally vague, overly broad statute!
HRS 338-19, by reason of age, usage, or otherwise in such condition that they can no longer....certify to the correctness. Statute is unConstitutionally vague and overly broad.
http://hawaii.gov/dhhl/applicants/appforms/applyhhl PROVES "CERTIFICATION" IS NOT "CERTIFICATE"!
PROOF: "Certification of Live Birth" is NOT the same as "Certificate of Birth"! CERTIFICATION requires additional verification!
District Court did not abuse its discretion in applying Federal Rules of Evidence
District Court did not abuse its discretion in applying Federal Rules of Evidence rather than Hawaii Health Department rules...under public records and reports exception to hearsay rule of Rule 803(6)(8). United States v De Water (1988, CA9 Hawaii) 846 F2d 528, 25 Fed Rules Evid Serv 748. 28 USCS Rule 803 Federal Rules of Evidence
28 USCS Section 1491 "except where states ...acted as agents of United States"
Court of Federal Claims lacks jurisidiction to hear claims against states or their agencies, EXCEPT where states or their agencies acted as agents of United States. Hassan v United States (1998) 41 Fed Cl 149. DID HAWAII ACT AS AGENT OF NANCY PELOSI & U.S. CONGRESS?
Jurisdiction of United States Court of Federal Claims http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/
28 USCS Section 1491(a)(1) The U.S. Court of Federal Claims shall have jurisidiction to render judgment upon any claim against the U.S. founded either upon the CONSITUTION or ANY Act of Congress or any regulation of the executive department, or upon any express or IMPLIED CONTRACT with the United States...an express or implied contract with the ARMY...
President Gerald Ford divulged his birth SECRETS, so President Obama should tell us his original long form birth certificate SECRETS!
NATURAL BORN CITIZEN LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE FACT OR FICTION?
NATURAL BORN CITIZEN
LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE
FACT OR FICTION?
A lot of writers have written about President Barack Hussein Obama or whatever his "real" name or name at birth, and whomever his biological father may be.
"THE LAST COW ON THE WHITE HOUSE LAWN" by BARBARA SEULING
is a little book with little-known facts about the Presidency.
Here are some examples of "facts" presented by Barbara Seuling in
"The Last Cow on the White House Lawn".
Are these "facts" correct? Do your own research and find out!
Page 6.
When titles were being discussed, John Adams proposed that George Washington
be called "His Highness, the President." Washington, for a while, preferred
"His Mightiness the President." Neither was adopted.
Page 17.
Andrew Jackson was the only first-generation American to become President.
All his forebears were foreign-born.
Page 19.
Martin Van Buren was the first United States President born under the U.S. FLAG.
The seven Presidents before him were born subjects of the British King.
Page 22.
No Vice President had succeeded to the presidency on the death of a President before
John Tyler. The Constitution was not clear about whether a Vice President should
simply ACT as President in case of a President's death or actually succeed to the Presidency. Tyler decided on the latter, setting the precedent for future succession. Some people called Tyler "His Accidency."
The first impeachment proceedings ever to take place against a President were begun against John Tyler in 1843 by those who believed that he had assumed the presidency illegally. The congressional resolution to start the proceedings was not passed.
Page 33.
Ulysses S. Grant was the first President of the United States to entertain a
reigning monarch, when King Kalakaua of the Sandwich Islands (now Hawaii) visited.
At a state dinner in the White House, the King's servants examined every bit of food before passing it on to their King.
Page 39.
Shaken by the death of his predecessor, Chester A. Arthur composed a document
before he left his New York home for Washington, proclaiming that should he die,
the Senate should elect a President pro tempore, or temporary President, so that
the nation's business could go on uninterrupted.
The Arthur administration enacted the first major immigration law, which excluded paupers, criminals, idiots, and the insane.
Page 58.
Woodrow Wilson's second wife, Edith, was a descendant of the Indian princess Pocahantas.
Until the 1850s, American Indian Chiefs used to come to Washington to negotiate
with Presidents and were treated as foreign diplomats.
Warren G. Harding was the first President for whom women could vote.
LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE
FACT OR FICTION?
A lot of writers have written about President Barack Hussein Obama or whatever his "real" name or name at birth, and whomever his biological father may be.
"THE LAST COW ON THE WHITE HOUSE LAWN" by BARBARA SEULING
is a little book with little-known facts about the Presidency.
Here are some examples of "facts" presented by Barbara Seuling in
"The Last Cow on the White House Lawn".
Are these "facts" correct? Do your own research and find out!
Page 6.
When titles were being discussed, John Adams proposed that George Washington
be called "His Highness, the President." Washington, for a while, preferred
"His Mightiness the President." Neither was adopted.
Page 17.
Andrew Jackson was the only first-generation American to become President.
All his forebears were foreign-born.
Page 19.
Martin Van Buren was the first United States President born under the U.S. FLAG.
The seven Presidents before him were born subjects of the British King.
Page 22.
No Vice President had succeeded to the presidency on the death of a President before
John Tyler. The Constitution was not clear about whether a Vice President should
simply ACT as President in case of a President's death or actually succeed to the Presidency. Tyler decided on the latter, setting the precedent for future succession. Some people called Tyler "His Accidency."
The first impeachment proceedings ever to take place against a President were begun against John Tyler in 1843 by those who believed that he had assumed the presidency illegally. The congressional resolution to start the proceedings was not passed.
Page 33.
Ulysses S. Grant was the first President of the United States to entertain a
reigning monarch, when King Kalakaua of the Sandwich Islands (now Hawaii) visited.
At a state dinner in the White House, the King's servants examined every bit of food before passing it on to their King.
Page 39.
Shaken by the death of his predecessor, Chester A. Arthur composed a document
before he left his New York home for Washington, proclaiming that should he die,
the Senate should elect a President pro tempore, or temporary President, so that
the nation's business could go on uninterrupted.
The Arthur administration enacted the first major immigration law, which excluded paupers, criminals, idiots, and the insane.
Page 58.
Woodrow Wilson's second wife, Edith, was a descendant of the Indian princess Pocahantas.
Until the 1850s, American Indian Chiefs used to come to Washington to negotiate
with Presidents and were treated as foreign diplomats.
Warren G. Harding was the first President for whom women could vote.
IS NANCY PELOSI A DUAL CITIZEN OF ISRAEL & IS THAT WHY SHE WON'T TELL THE "TRUTH" ABOUT OBAMA'S BIRTH CERTIFICATE?
IS NANCY PELOSI, DEMOCRATIC SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS, A JEWISH DUAL CITIZEN OF THE JEWISH STATE OF ISRAEL,
AND IS THAT WHY SHE WON'T DIVULGE THE MATERIAL FACTS THAT MAY PROVE THAT PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA IS NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN?
IS BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA THREATENING NANCY PELOSI WITH EXPOSING HER, BECAUSE IF SHE IS A DUAL CITIZEN OF THE JEWISH STATE OF ISRAEL THEN SHE IS SUCH A SERIOUS CONFLICT OF INTEREST TO NATIONAL SECURITY THAT SHE HAS NO RIGHT TO BE 3RD IN LINE TO THE PRESIDENCY?
HOW MANY MEMBERS OF U.S. CONGRESS ARE DUAL CITIZENS OF OTHER COUNTRIES, WITH CONFLICTS OF INTEREST TO OUR SOVEREIGN NATIONAL SECURITY?
AND IS THAT WHY SHE WON'T DIVULGE THE MATERIAL FACTS THAT MAY PROVE THAT PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA IS NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN?
IS BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA THREATENING NANCY PELOSI WITH EXPOSING HER, BECAUSE IF SHE IS A DUAL CITIZEN OF THE JEWISH STATE OF ISRAEL THEN SHE IS SUCH A SERIOUS CONFLICT OF INTEREST TO NATIONAL SECURITY THAT SHE HAS NO RIGHT TO BE 3RD IN LINE TO THE PRESIDENCY?
HOW MANY MEMBERS OF U.S. CONGRESS ARE DUAL CITIZENS OF OTHER COUNTRIES, WITH CONFLICTS OF INTEREST TO OUR SOVEREIGN NATIONAL SECURITY?
PRESIDENT OBAMA SIGNED A LAW TO STOP THE BIRTHERS FROM DISCOVERING THE TRUTH ABOUT HIS PLACE OF BIRTH AND REAL FATHER!
PESIDENT OBAMA SIGNED INTO LAW AN EXECUTIVE ORDER
TO TRY TO STOP THE BIRTHERS FROM DISCOVERING
WHERE HE WAS BORN AND WHO HIS REAL BIOLOGICAL FATHER IS,
AND IF HE IS A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.
THIS LAW WHICH WENT INTO EFFECT IMMEDIATELY WHEN PRESIDENT
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA SIGNED IT THIS YEAR, 2009,
IS ALLEGEDLY INTENDED TO SUBVERT THE CONSTITUTION OF THE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND VOTERS' RIGHTS TO KNOW
IF A PRESIDENT IS A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN BY
SERIOUSLY AND WILLFULLY AND INTENTIONALLY CONCEALING
MATERIAL FACTS INCLUDING HIS ORIGINAL LONG FORM BIRTH
CERTIFICATE,
AND THE HOSPITAL OR TAXI CAB HE WAS BORN IN,
AND THE NURSE OR DOCTOR OR TAXI CAB DRIVER WHO ASSISTED
HIS MOTHER WITH DELIVERY,
AND WHETHER OR NOT HE WAS A BREACH BIRTH,
OR BORN WITH FORCEPS,
OR IF HIS MOTHER WAS GIVEN A SPINAL INJECTION FOR PAIN,
AND ALL OF THE NORMAL DETAILS OF MEDICAL RECORDS
WHICH WOULD CONCLUSIVELY HELP TO PROVE IF
PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA IS OR IS NOT
A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN
AND WHO IS HIS BIOLOGICAL FATHER?
PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS
FEDERAL REGISTER Vol. 74, No. 15 Monday, January 26, 2009
Title 3 -- Executive Order 13489 of January 21, 2009 THE PRESIDENT
PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws
of the United States of America, and in order to
establish policies and procedures
governing the assertion of executive privilege by incumbent and former
Presidents in connection with the release of Presidential records by the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) pursuant to the
Presidential Records Act of 1978, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. Definitions. For purposes of this order:
(a) "Archivist" refers to the Archivist of the United States or his designee.
(b) "NARA" refers to the National Archives and Records Administration.
(c) "Presidential Records Act" refers to the Presidential Records Act,
44 U.S.C. 2201-2207.
(d) "NARA regulations" refers to the NARA regulations implementing
the Presidential Records Act, 36 C.F.R. Part 1270.
(e) "Presidential records" refers to those documentary materials maintained
by NARA pursuant to the Presidential Records Act, including
Vice Presidential records.
(f) "Foremer President" refers to the former President during whose term or
terms of office particular Presidential records were created.
(g) A "substantial question of executive privilege" exists if NARA's
disclosure of Presidential records might impair national security
(including the conduct of foreign relations), law enforcement,
or the deliberative processes of the executive branch.
(h) A "final court order"
is a court order
from which
no appeal may be taken.
Sec. 2. Notice of Intent to Disclose Presidentail Records.
(a) When the Archivist provides notice to the incumbent and former
Presidents of his intent to disclose Presidential records pursuant to
section 1270.46 of the NARA regulations, the Archivist, using any
guidelines provided by the incumbent and former Presidents,
shall identify any specific materials, the disclosure of which he
believes may raise a substantial question of executive privilege.
However, nothing in this order is intended to affect the right of the
incumbent or former Presidents to invoke executive privilege with
respect to materials not identified by the Archivist. Copies of the
notice for the incumbent President shall be delivered to the President
(through the Counsel to the President) and the Attorney General
(through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel).
The copy of the notice for the former President shall be delivered to the
former President or his designated representative.
(b) Upon the passage of 30 days after receipt by the incumbent and
former Presidents of a notice of intent to disclose Presidential records,
the Archivist may disclose the records covered by the notice,
unless during that time period
the Archivist
has received a
claim of
executive privilege
by the incumbent or former President
or the
Archivist has been instructed by the incumbent President or his designee
to extend the time period
for a time certain
and with reason for the
extension of time
provided in the notice. If a shorter period of time
is required under the circumstances set forth in
section 1270.44 of
the NARA
regulations,
the Archivist shall so indicate in the notice.
Sec. 3. Claim of Executive Privilege by Incumbent President.
(a) Upon receipt of a notice of intent to disclose Presidential records,
the Attorney General (directly or through the Assistant Attorney General
for the Office of Legal Counsel) and the Counsel to the President shall
review as they deem appropriate the records covered by the notice
and consult with each other,
the Archivist, and such other executive
agencies as they deem appropriate
concerning
whether invocation
of executive privilege
is justified.
(b) The Attorney General and the Counsel to the President,
in the exercise of their discretion and after appropriate review and consultation
under subsection (a) of this section,
may jointly determine that invocation
of executive privilege is
not justified.
The Archivist shall be notified
promptly of any such determination.
(c) If either the Attorney General or the Counsel to the President
believes that the circumstances
justify invocation of executive privilege,
the issue shall be presented to the President by the Counsel to the
President and the Attorney General.
(d) If the President
decides to invoke
executive privilege,
the
Counsel to the President shall notify the former President, the Archivist,
and the Attorney General in writing of the
claim of privilege
and the
specific Presidential records
to which it relates.
After receiving such notice,
the Archivist
shall not disclose
the privileged records
unless directed to do so
by an incumbent President
or
by a final court order.
Sec. 4. Claim of Executive Privilege by Former President.
(a) Upon receipt of a claim
of executive privilege by a living former President,
the Archivist shall consult with
the Attorney General (through the Assistant Attorney General for the
Office of Legal Counsel), the Counsel to the President, and such other
executive agencies as the Archivist deems appropriate concerning the
Archivist's determination as to whether to honor the former President's
claim of privilege or instead to disclose the Presidential records notwithstanding
the claim of privilege. Any determination under section 3 of this order that
executive privilege shall not be invoked by the incumbent President
shall not prejudice the Archivist's determination with respect to the
former President's claim of privilege.
(b) In making the determination referred to in subsection
(a) of this section,
the Archivist
shall abide by any instructions
given him
by the incumbent President
or his designee unless otherwise
directed by
a final court order.
The Archivist shall notify the incumbent
and former Presidents of his determination at least 30 days prior to
disclosure of the Presidential records, unless a shorter time period is
required in the circumstances set forth in
section 1270.44 of the NARA regulations.
Copies of the notice for the
incumbent President shall be delivered to the President
(through the Counsel to the President) and the Attorney General
(through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel).
The copy of the notice for the former President shall be delivered
to the former President or his designated reprsentative.
Sec. 5. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed
to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) authority granted by law to a department or agency, or the head thereof;
or
(ii) functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget
relating to budget, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and
subject to
the availability of
appropriations.
(c) This order is not intended to,
and
does not,
create any right or benefit,
substantive or procedual,
enforceable at law or in equity by any party
against the United States,
its departments, agencies, or entitites,
its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
Sec. 6. Revocation. Executive Order 13233 of November 1, 2001, is revoked.
SIGNED: BARACK OBAMA
THE WHITE HOUSE JANUARY 21, 2009
[FR Doc. E9-1712
Filed 1-23-09; 8:45 a.m.]
Biling code 3195-W-P
TO TRY TO STOP THE BIRTHERS FROM DISCOVERING
WHERE HE WAS BORN AND WHO HIS REAL BIOLOGICAL FATHER IS,
AND IF HE IS A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.
THIS LAW WHICH WENT INTO EFFECT IMMEDIATELY WHEN PRESIDENT
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA SIGNED IT THIS YEAR, 2009,
IS ALLEGEDLY INTENDED TO SUBVERT THE CONSTITUTION OF THE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND VOTERS' RIGHTS TO KNOW
IF A PRESIDENT IS A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN BY
SERIOUSLY AND WILLFULLY AND INTENTIONALLY CONCEALING
MATERIAL FACTS INCLUDING HIS ORIGINAL LONG FORM BIRTH
CERTIFICATE,
AND THE HOSPITAL OR TAXI CAB HE WAS BORN IN,
AND THE NURSE OR DOCTOR OR TAXI CAB DRIVER WHO ASSISTED
HIS MOTHER WITH DELIVERY,
AND WHETHER OR NOT HE WAS A BREACH BIRTH,
OR BORN WITH FORCEPS,
OR IF HIS MOTHER WAS GIVEN A SPINAL INJECTION FOR PAIN,
AND ALL OF THE NORMAL DETAILS OF MEDICAL RECORDS
WHICH WOULD CONCLUSIVELY HELP TO PROVE IF
PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA IS OR IS NOT
A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN
AND WHO IS HIS BIOLOGICAL FATHER?
PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS
FEDERAL REGISTER Vol. 74, No. 15 Monday, January 26, 2009
Title 3 -- Executive Order 13489 of January 21, 2009 THE PRESIDENT
PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws
of the United States of America, and in order to
establish policies and procedures
governing the assertion of executive privilege by incumbent and former
Presidents in connection with the release of Presidential records by the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) pursuant to the
Presidential Records Act of 1978, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. Definitions. For purposes of this order:
(a) "Archivist" refers to the Archivist of the United States or his designee.
(b) "NARA" refers to the National Archives and Records Administration.
(c) "Presidential Records Act" refers to the Presidential Records Act,
44 U.S.C. 2201-2207.
(d) "NARA regulations" refers to the NARA regulations implementing
the Presidential Records Act, 36 C.F.R. Part 1270.
(e) "Presidential records" refers to those documentary materials maintained
by NARA pursuant to the Presidential Records Act, including
Vice Presidential records.
(f) "Foremer President" refers to the former President during whose term or
terms of office particular Presidential records were created.
(g) A "substantial question of executive privilege" exists if NARA's
disclosure of Presidential records might impair national security
(including the conduct of foreign relations), law enforcement,
or the deliberative processes of the executive branch.
(h) A "final court order"
is a court order
from which
no appeal may be taken.
Sec. 2. Notice of Intent to Disclose Presidentail Records.
(a) When the Archivist provides notice to the incumbent and former
Presidents of his intent to disclose Presidential records pursuant to
section 1270.46 of the NARA regulations, the Archivist, using any
guidelines provided by the incumbent and former Presidents,
shall identify any specific materials, the disclosure of which he
believes may raise a substantial question of executive privilege.
However, nothing in this order is intended to affect the right of the
incumbent or former Presidents to invoke executive privilege with
respect to materials not identified by the Archivist. Copies of the
notice for the incumbent President shall be delivered to the President
(through the Counsel to the President) and the Attorney General
(through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel).
The copy of the notice for the former President shall be delivered to the
former President or his designated representative.
(b) Upon the passage of 30 days after receipt by the incumbent and
former Presidents of a notice of intent to disclose Presidential records,
the Archivist may disclose the records covered by the notice,
unless during that time period
the Archivist
has received a
claim of
executive privilege
by the incumbent or former President
or the
Archivist has been instructed by the incumbent President or his designee
to extend the time period
for a time certain
and with reason for the
extension of time
provided in the notice. If a shorter period of time
is required under the circumstances set forth in
section 1270.44 of
the NARA
regulations,
the Archivist shall so indicate in the notice.
Sec. 3. Claim of Executive Privilege by Incumbent President.
(a) Upon receipt of a notice of intent to disclose Presidential records,
the Attorney General (directly or through the Assistant Attorney General
for the Office of Legal Counsel) and the Counsel to the President shall
review as they deem appropriate the records covered by the notice
and consult with each other,
the Archivist, and such other executive
agencies as they deem appropriate
concerning
whether invocation
of executive privilege
is justified.
(b) The Attorney General and the Counsel to the President,
in the exercise of their discretion and after appropriate review and consultation
under subsection (a) of this section,
may jointly determine that invocation
of executive privilege is
not justified.
The Archivist shall be notified
promptly of any such determination.
(c) If either the Attorney General or the Counsel to the President
believes that the circumstances
justify invocation of executive privilege,
the issue shall be presented to the President by the Counsel to the
President and the Attorney General.
(d) If the President
decides to invoke
executive privilege,
the
Counsel to the President shall notify the former President, the Archivist,
and the Attorney General in writing of the
claim of privilege
and the
specific Presidential records
to which it relates.
After receiving such notice,
the Archivist
shall not disclose
the privileged records
unless directed to do so
by an incumbent President
or
by a final court order.
Sec. 4. Claim of Executive Privilege by Former President.
(a) Upon receipt of a claim
of executive privilege by a living former President,
the Archivist shall consult with
the Attorney General (through the Assistant Attorney General for the
Office of Legal Counsel), the Counsel to the President, and such other
executive agencies as the Archivist deems appropriate concerning the
Archivist's determination as to whether to honor the former President's
claim of privilege or instead to disclose the Presidential records notwithstanding
the claim of privilege. Any determination under section 3 of this order that
executive privilege shall not be invoked by the incumbent President
shall not prejudice the Archivist's determination with respect to the
former President's claim of privilege.
(b) In making the determination referred to in subsection
(a) of this section,
the Archivist
shall abide by any instructions
given him
by the incumbent President
or his designee unless otherwise
directed by
a final court order.
The Archivist shall notify the incumbent
and former Presidents of his determination at least 30 days prior to
disclosure of the Presidential records, unless a shorter time period is
required in the circumstances set forth in
section 1270.44 of the NARA regulations.
Copies of the notice for the
incumbent President shall be delivered to the President
(through the Counsel to the President) and the Attorney General
(through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel).
The copy of the notice for the former President shall be delivered
to the former President or his designated reprsentative.
Sec. 5. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed
to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) authority granted by law to a department or agency, or the head thereof;
or
(ii) functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget
relating to budget, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and
subject to
the availability of
appropriations.
(c) This order is not intended to,
and
does not,
create any right or benefit,
substantive or procedual,
enforceable at law or in equity by any party
against the United States,
its departments, agencies, or entitites,
its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
Sec. 6. Revocation. Executive Order 13233 of November 1, 2001, is revoked.
SIGNED: BARACK OBAMA
THE WHITE HOUSE JANUARY 21, 2009
[FR Doc. E9-1712
Filed 1-23-09; 8:45 a.m.]
Biling code 3195-W-P
PLEASE PROTECT BALD EAGLES AT STOUGHTON POND, SPRINGFIELD, VERMONT!
PLEASE PROTECT BALD EAGLES AT STOUGHTON POND, SPRINGFIELD, VERMONT!
OCT. 7, 2009 CUT & PASTE INTO ONLINE CONTACT FORMS
http://www.senate.gov
http://www.house.gov
URGENT TO U.S. SENATOR BERNIE SANDERS,
U.S. SENATOR PATRICK LEAHY
AND U.S. CONGRESSMAN PETER WELCH OF VERMONT:
BALD EAGLES
UNDER THREAT BY HUNTERS
AT STOUGHTON POND,
SPRINGFIELD, VERMONT?
I saw hunters with rifles and one swinging a dead wild turkey WALKING
TOWARDS ME, WHILE I WAS PARKED IN THE PARKING LOT JUST
ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE DAM, NOT THE BEACH PARKING LOT.
THE PARKING LOT ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE DAM IS ALSO THE
SIDE OF THE POND I HAVE SEEN
BALD EAGLES
ON TWICE.
ONCE I SAW A
BALD EAGLE
ON THE BEACH SIDE OF THE POND. Three times I saw BALD EAGLES
August and September 2009 at Stoughton Pond, Springfield, Vermont.
Here is my question:
What are the laws about hunting where there are live BALD EAGLES?
CAN IMMEDIATE
EMERGENCY FEDERAL FUNDING
BE GRANTED
TO PROTECT THE
AMERICAN BALD EAGLES
AT STOUGHTON POND,
SPRINGFIELD, VERMONT?
I will try again to get photos, when I have my camera the Eagles don't show up,
but other people have seen them, and the nice young man cleaning the steps
down to the swimming beach at Stoughton Pond earlier in September 2009
stated that he had seen the BALD EAGLES.
WILL YOU HELP THE AMERICAN BALD EAGLES TODAY?
As soon as I get photos or video of the BALD EAGLES,
I will blog ALL OVER THE INTERNET and go on public access television
all over Vermont.
I WOULD APPRECIATE IT IF YOU WOULD TAKE CARE OF THIS PROBLEM
OF LACK OF ADEQUATE PROTECTION FOR THE AMERICAN BALD
EAGLES OF STOUGHTON POND, SPRINGFIELD, VERMONT
BEFORE I AM FORCED TO MAKE A HUGE POLITICAL ISSUE OF
YOUR LACK OF PROTECTION FOR THESE BEAUTIFUL BIRDS.
IN OTHER WORDS, THIS IS FAIR NOTICE THAT I BELIEVE THERE IS A
PROBLEM OF LACK OF ADEQUATE PROTECTION.
I WOULD HATE TO HAVE
TO SHOW PEOPLE ACTUAL VIDEO FOOTAGE OF HUNTERS
CARRYING RIFLES IN THE
SAME VIDEO PICTURE AS BALD EAGLES.
CRIS ERICSON http://crisericson.com
879 Church Street
Chester, Vermont 05143
(802)875-4038
OCT. 7, 2009 CUT & PASTE INTO ONLINE CONTACT FORMS
http://www.senate.gov
http://www.house.gov
URGENT TO U.S. SENATOR BERNIE SANDERS,
U.S. SENATOR PATRICK LEAHY
AND U.S. CONGRESSMAN PETER WELCH OF VERMONT:
BALD EAGLES
UNDER THREAT BY HUNTERS
AT STOUGHTON POND,
SPRINGFIELD, VERMONT?
I saw hunters with rifles and one swinging a dead wild turkey WALKING
TOWARDS ME, WHILE I WAS PARKED IN THE PARKING LOT JUST
ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE DAM, NOT THE BEACH PARKING LOT.
THE PARKING LOT ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE DAM IS ALSO THE
SIDE OF THE POND I HAVE SEEN
BALD EAGLES
ON TWICE.
ONCE I SAW A
BALD EAGLE
ON THE BEACH SIDE OF THE POND. Three times I saw BALD EAGLES
August and September 2009 at Stoughton Pond, Springfield, Vermont.
Here is my question:
What are the laws about hunting where there are live BALD EAGLES?
CAN IMMEDIATE
EMERGENCY FEDERAL FUNDING
BE GRANTED
TO PROTECT THE
AMERICAN BALD EAGLES
AT STOUGHTON POND,
SPRINGFIELD, VERMONT?
I will try again to get photos, when I have my camera the Eagles don't show up,
but other people have seen them, and the nice young man cleaning the steps
down to the swimming beach at Stoughton Pond earlier in September 2009
stated that he had seen the BALD EAGLES.
WILL YOU HELP THE AMERICAN BALD EAGLES TODAY?
As soon as I get photos or video of the BALD EAGLES,
I will blog ALL OVER THE INTERNET and go on public access television
all over Vermont.
I WOULD APPRECIATE IT IF YOU WOULD TAKE CARE OF THIS PROBLEM
OF LACK OF ADEQUATE PROTECTION FOR THE AMERICAN BALD
EAGLES OF STOUGHTON POND, SPRINGFIELD, VERMONT
BEFORE I AM FORCED TO MAKE A HUGE POLITICAL ISSUE OF
YOUR LACK OF PROTECTION FOR THESE BEAUTIFUL BIRDS.
IN OTHER WORDS, THIS IS FAIR NOTICE THAT I BELIEVE THERE IS A
PROBLEM OF LACK OF ADEQUATE PROTECTION.
I WOULD HATE TO HAVE
TO SHOW PEOPLE ACTUAL VIDEO FOOTAGE OF HUNTERS
CARRYING RIFLES IN THE
SAME VIDEO PICTURE AS BALD EAGLES.
CRIS ERICSON http://crisericson.com
879 Church Street
Chester, Vermont 05143
(802)875-4038
Is President Barack Hussein Obama a Natural Born Citizen? Issue w/phots of laws you need to study
Is President Barack Hussein Obama a Natural Born Citizen? Issue w/photos of laws you need to study
above.
REASONABLE DOUBT?
REASONABLE DOUBT!
above.
REASONABLE DOUBT?
REASONABLE DOUBT!
PEOPLE ARE TIRED OF GOVERNMENT BY THE RICH AND FOR THE RICH!
PEOPLE ARE TIRED OF GOVERNMENT BY THE RICH & WEALTHY
AND
FOR THE RICH & WEALTHY!
GOVERNMENT SHOULD BE FAIR FOR DISABLED AND POOR PEOPLE!
2010 VOTE CRIS ERICSON Vermont Independent!
2010 VOTE CRIS ERICSON for U.S. SENATOR for VERMONT
and
2010 VOTE CRIS ERICSON for GOVERNOR of VERMONT
PLEASE SEND CAMPAIGN DONATION CHECKS TO:
CAMPAIGN TO ELECT CRIS ERICSON FOR UNITED STATES SENATE 2010
OR
CAMPAIGN TO ELECT CRIS ERICSON FOR GOVERNOR 2010
879 CHURCH STREET
CHESTER, VERMONT 05143 (802)875-4038
#1 ISSUE FOR 2010!
IS VERMONT CORRUPT IN THE ELECTION PROCESS?
In 2008 Deborah Markowitz allegedly used taxpayer money and the official seal of
her office to join an unregistered and illegal political
action committee that promoted three candidates for
Governor of Vermont in 2008,
while fraudulently concealing
material facts that there were actually seven candidates
for Governor on the official election ballot.
Deborah Markowitz Coalition with VPT
Cris Ericson alleges she was abused by Vermont Secretary
of State Deborah Markowitz because Markowitz had no right
to use taxpayer funds and the official seal of her office
to discriminate against candidate Cris Ericson.
Markowitz Coalition
Others participating in this Coalition which discriminated
against Cris Ericson include University of Vermont,
Vermont Public Television, Corporation for Public Broadcasting,
AARP, League of Women Voters.
HOW DARE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT EXCLUDE CANDIDATES
FROM DEBATES AND FORUMS!
ALL TAX PAYER FUNDING TO UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT
SHOULD END IMMEDIATELY!
THERE IS NO ONE WORSE THAN A WEALTHY, RICH PERSON
WHO THINKS THEY ARE BETTER THAN SOMEONE
WHO IS POOR OR DISABLED!
DO YOU THINK GOD COUNTS HOW MUCH MONEY YOU EARNED
WHEN YOU ARE KNOCKING ON HEAVEN'S DOOR?
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WILL NOT BE
A FREE COUNTRY
SO LONG
AS DISABLED AND POOR PEOPLE
ARE EXCLUDED FROM
CANDIDATE DEBATES AND FORUMS!
THE POOR AND DISABLED ARE TIRED OF GOVERNMENT
BEING
OF THE RICH AND WEALTHY
AND BY THE RICH AND WEALTHY
AND FOR THE RICH WEALTHY!
Vermont Public Television, VPT, is funded in part by the
Annenberg Foundation,
which allegedly owns Factcheck.org
which allegedly promoted the campaign of Barack Hussein Obama
by posting a "Certification of Live Birth"
ALLEGING THAT WAS ADEQUATE EVIDENCE OF HIS CITIZENSHIP,
WHEN IN FACT,
DOESN'T IT ONLY PROVES REASONABLE DOUBT BECAUSE
IT IS NOT A
LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE? NATURAL BORN CITIZEN?
Vermont League of Cities and Towns allegedly created
an illegal and unregistered political action committee
and received member dues from cities and towns in Vermont,
all of which was 100% paid for by taxpayers, and an illegal
use of taxpayer money because Vermont League of Cities &
Towns then used those taxpayer funds to hold a 2008
Governor candidate debate at the
Killington Grand Resort Hotel, in which they refused to include
candidate Cris Ericson.
Title 18 United States Code, Section 241
Crimes and Criminal Procedure, Part I, Chapter 13 CIVIL RIGHTS
If two or more persons conspire to injure, OPPRESS, threaten, or
INTIMIDATE any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth,
Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any
right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of
the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same;
they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned...
United States Constitution Article XIV
14th Amendment
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States
and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the
United States and of the State wherein they reside.
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the
privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States;
nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or
property, without due process of law; NOR DENY TO ANY PERSON
WITHIN ITS JURISDICTION THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS.
POLL TAXES ARE ILLEGAL, THEREFORE,
SHOULD IT NOT ALSO
BE ILLEGAL
TO EXCLUDE ANY CANDIDATES WITHOUT CAMPAIGN BUDGETS
OR WITH SMALL CAMPAIGN BUDGETS
FROM DEBATES?
Debates are equivalent to job interviews so
to deny any candidate participation in any publicly
funded debate or forum,
paid for by taxpayer dollars,
is serious discrmination!
ISN'T EXCLUDING CANDIDATES WITH SMALL OR TINY
CAMPAIGN BUDGETS FROM DEBATES
THE SAME AS AN ILLEGAL POLL TAX?
Article XVI
The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes,
from whatever source derived, without apportionment among
the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.
WHEN TAXES ARE COLLECTED AND USED TO HOLD CANDIDATE DEBATES,
AND SOME CANDIDATES ARE EXCLUDED FROM PARTICIPATING IN THE DEBATES,
THEN ISN'T IT TRUE
THAT THE EXCLUDED CANDIDATES
HAVE BEEN DENIED EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS?
Did Deborah Markowitz, Vermont Secretary of State
with the members of the Coalition she joined in 2008,
exceed her authority and/or abuse her authority and/or
violate state and federal laws in the 2008 campaign season
and election because she used taxpayer funds
and her official office and the official SEAL of
her office to exclude 2008 gubernatorial candidate
Cris Ericson from participating in her Coalition
which promoted other candidates,
while excluding Cris Ericson?
Title 42 U.S.C. Section 1985
(1) If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire to
prevent, by force, INTIMIDATION, or threat, ANY PERSON from
ACCEPTING or holding office, trust, OR PLACE OF CONFIDENCE
under the United States...
QUESTION? Is being a political candidate a "place of confidence" and
is being excluded from a publicly funded candidate forum a form of
"intimidation"?
Is holding political office "employment"?
42 United States Code, Section 1981 EQUAL RIGHTS UNDER THE LAW
Section 1981a. Damages in cases of intentional discrmination in employment.
Section 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights.
Section 1985. Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights.
Section 1997h. Notice to Federal Departments.
42 U.S.C. Section 12201
Equal Opportunity for Individuals with Disabilities
IS BEING POOR A DISABILITY?
BEING POOR WAS THE CAUSE OF THE POLL TAX,
WHICH WAS OUT-LAWED.
42 U.S.C. Section 1973aa-1 Residence requirements for voting
(a) Congressional findings,
The Congress hereby finds that the imposition and application of the
durational residency requirement as a precondition to voting...
(5) has the effect of denying to citizens the equality of
civil rights, and due process and equal protection of the laws
that are guaranteed to them under the 14th amendment...
THEREFORE, BECAUSE 42 U.S.C. Section 1973aa-1 determined
that "EQUAL PROTECTION" DOES NOT MEAN JUST
IN REGARD TO RACE, NATIONAL ORIGIN, SEX, DISABILITY OR RELIGION,
"EQUAL PROTECTION" ALSO HAS BROADER DEFINITIONS!
Did Vermont Secretary of State,
Deborah Markowitz
VIOLATE THE INTENT OF THE VERMONT STATE LAWS,
INCLUDING:
17 V.S.A. SECTION 2810
17 V.S.A. SECTION 2811
17 V.S.A SECTION 2831
in conjunction with 17 V.S.A. Section 2851 (2) and
17 V.S.A. Section 2891 and 2892?
THIS IS THE NUMBER ONE
POLITICAL ISSUE IN VERMONT ! ! !
IT IS NOT LEGAL TO USE PUBLIC FUNDS
TO HOLD POLITICAL CANDIDATE DEBATES
AND TO EXCLUDE ANY CANDIDATE!
THE STATE OF VERMONT
IS A HOTBED OF CORRUPTION ! ! !
Ms. Cris Ericson suffered defeat in toxic tort litigation only after U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy took campaign donations from her opposing attorneys Political Action Committee, Dewey Ballantine PAC, which took money from her opposing attorneys who were employed by Dewey Ballantine, Wayne Cross and Stuart Hirshfield, as proven by Federal Election Commission public records!
U.S. SENATOR PATRICK LEAHY IS ALLEGEDLY TOTALLY CORRUPT!!!
Ms. Cris Ericson has 10 years of litigation experience in state and federal courts. U.S. Supreme Court Reports by Daniel A. Klein, LEXIS Publishing, 2001, Page 119, Cris Ericson, Petitioner v IDC Services, Inc., et al. 528 US, 146 L Ed 2d, 2000 US LEXIS 1560, 120 S Ct 1265. February 28, 2000. 94-4630(RMT) U.S.D.C. Los Angeles, 97 Civ 3081 (TPG) U.S.D.C./SDNY WestLaw and Federal Bankruptcy Law Reporter Ericson v In re IDC
THE PUBLISHED FEDERAL COURT OPINION BY JUDGE THOMAS P. GRIESA, IN STATEMENT OF FACTS, STATES THAT CRIS ERICSON WAS INJURED WITH PETN, LEAD AZIDE AND LEAD STYPHNATE.
These cases should be re-opened on the Supreme Court of the United States own motion, because after filing a complaint against state plan OSHA and bringing in federal OSHA, after Ms. Ericson's husband died, she finally received material safety data hazard sheets, which should have been provided before employee exposure, keeping in mind that neither she nor her now deceased husband ever received medical treatment, and once the evidence was in that there were in fact three toxic chemicals in the special effects used filming the motion picture "Point Break", then after that, all of her court papers were dismissed and denied.
THE COURTS ARE CORRUPT!
Cris Ericson was injured by celebrity actor Patrick Swayze with three federally regulated toxic, hazardous chemicals, one of which was lead azide, which is a carcinogen. Patrick Swayze is now reported in the news to be near death of cancer. Cris Ericson's husband was also exposed, and died of cancer.
Cris Ericson lost in court, after U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy took campaign donations from the Political Action Committee of her opposing attorneys, Wayne Cross and Stuart Hirshfield.
II.
"EPA denied the requested relief because the petition did not include sufficient information to provide a basis for the Agency to conclude that an unreasonable risk may exist"
THEN SEE THE CONTRADICTION
A.
"the health effects of lead and lead azide are well documented in the scientific literature. Lead azide is a skin and eye irritant, explosive, a carcinogen, and toxic to the lungs, kidneys, nervous system, blood and reproductive system... and even death...
THE CONTRADICTION IS ALARMING AND PROOF OF ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION!
U.S. SENATOR PATRICK LEAHY SHOULD BE IMPEACHED!
Lead Azide; Response to (Cris Ericson) Citizen's Petition Under TSCA Section 21
[Federal Register: April 15, 1997 (Volume 62, Number 72)]
[Notices]
[Page 18350-18352]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr15ap97_dat-53]
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[OPPTS-211043; FRL-5578-1]
Lead Azide; Response to Citizen's Petition Under TSCA Section 21
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Action: Notice; Denial of TSCA Section 21 Petition.
Summary: EPA received a petition under section 21 of the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA) on May 2, 1996, from a citizen requesting
that the Agency promulgate a regulation under TSCA section 6 that would
prohibit the manufacturing, processing, or distribution in commerce of
lead azide. The petitioner claims that she suffered injuries through
the use of lead azide to produce a ``special effect'' in filmmaking and
that manufacture of such substance should be prohibited to prevent
future human injury. EPA has evaluated the petition and upon further
consideration, denied it on July 31, 1996.
For Further Information Contact: Susan B. Hazen, Director,
Environmental Assistance Division (7408), Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW.,
Washington, DC 20460, Telephone: 202-260-1404, TDD: (202-554-0551), e-
mail: TSCA-Hotline@epa.mail.epa.gov.
...[[Page 18351]]
in commerce of a chemical substance. To issue a section 6 rule on a
chemical substance, EPA must find that a reasonable basis exists to
conclude that the manufacture, processing, distribution in commerce,
use or disposal of a chemical substance or mixture, or that any
combination of such activities, presents or will present an
unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment. TSCA section
6 requires EPA to apply the least burdensome requirement to protect
adequately against the risk.
This finding of unreasonable risk is a
judgement by EPA that the
risk of health
or environmental injury
from a
chemical substance or mixture outweighs
the burden to society
for
potential regulation.
OH! REALLY?
LEAD AZIDE IS A MAIN COMPONENT INGREDIENT OF "IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICES" USED BY TERRORISTS, AND MOVING IT IN COMMERCE UNDER THE GUISE OF "SPECIAL EFFECTS" ALLEGEDLY AIDS TERRORISM!
AFTER FILING A COMPLAINT AGAINST STATE OSHA, AND BRINGING IN FEDERAL OSHA, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE "SPECIAL EFFECTS" ALSO CONTAIN PETN PLASTIC HIGH EXPLOSIVES AND LEAD STYPHNATE, ALSO INGREDIENTS OF IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICES USED BY TERRORISTS.
PATRICK SWAYZE HAD HIS HANDS ON THE "SPECIAL EFFECTS" before he threw them at Cris Ericson, assaulting and battering her and injuring her with the exothermic decomposition products; and now he has DIED of cancer. Lead Azide is a carcinogen.
Will Patrick Swayze allegedly DID NOT warn and inform movie industry workers, before he died, about the truth about Lead Azide, PETN and Lead Styphnate! Did Patrick Swayze die with his deadly secret and have all of his assets & funds put in a trust controlled by his wife?
Lead Azide can cause cancer in a two hour industrial exposure. Cris Ericson's husband also worked on "Point Break" and was exposed to Lead Azide and died of cancer. Will he meet Patrick Swayze at Heaven's Gate?
U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy is allegedly corrupt, having taken political donations from attorneys for the movie industry in this case, Dewey Ballantine PAC, after Cris Ericson allegedly complained to the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee for Judicial violations of federal Labor Law 29 CFR 1910.1200 and failing to state in the published federal opinion that Lead Azide, Lead Styphnate and PETN are in fact federally regulated, toxic hazardous substances with reporting requirements which were not met.
The movie industry allegedly still abuses workers by exposing them to Lead Azide, Lead Styphnate and PETN which are all federally regulated toxic hazardous substances, under the fraudulent guise of "harmless special effects". When will the abuse and coverup end?
2010 Vote for Cris Ericson for Honesty in Government!
CRIS ERICSON 879 Church St., Chester, VT 05143.
AND
FOR THE RICH & WEALTHY!
GOVERNMENT SHOULD BE FAIR FOR DISABLED AND POOR PEOPLE!
2010 VOTE CRIS ERICSON Vermont Independent!
2010 VOTE CRIS ERICSON for U.S. SENATOR for VERMONT
and
2010 VOTE CRIS ERICSON for GOVERNOR of VERMONT
PLEASE SEND CAMPAIGN DONATION CHECKS TO:
CAMPAIGN TO ELECT CRIS ERICSON FOR UNITED STATES SENATE 2010
OR
CAMPAIGN TO ELECT CRIS ERICSON FOR GOVERNOR 2010
879 CHURCH STREET
CHESTER, VERMONT 05143 (802)875-4038
#1 ISSUE FOR 2010!
IS VERMONT CORRUPT IN THE ELECTION PROCESS?
In 2008 Deborah Markowitz allegedly used taxpayer money and the official seal of
her office to join an unregistered and illegal political
action committee that promoted three candidates for
Governor of Vermont in 2008,
while fraudulently concealing
material facts that there were actually seven candidates
for Governor on the official election ballot.
Deborah Markowitz Coalition with VPT
Cris Ericson alleges she was abused by Vermont Secretary
of State Deborah Markowitz because Markowitz had no right
to use taxpayer funds and the official seal of her office
to discriminate against candidate Cris Ericson.
Markowitz Coalition
Others participating in this Coalition which discriminated
against Cris Ericson include University of Vermont,
Vermont Public Television, Corporation for Public Broadcasting,
AARP, League of Women Voters.
HOW DARE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT EXCLUDE CANDIDATES
FROM DEBATES AND FORUMS!
ALL TAX PAYER FUNDING TO UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT
SHOULD END IMMEDIATELY!
THERE IS NO ONE WORSE THAN A WEALTHY, RICH PERSON
WHO THINKS THEY ARE BETTER THAN SOMEONE
WHO IS POOR OR DISABLED!
DO YOU THINK GOD COUNTS HOW MUCH MONEY YOU EARNED
WHEN YOU ARE KNOCKING ON HEAVEN'S DOOR?
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WILL NOT BE
A FREE COUNTRY
SO LONG
AS DISABLED AND POOR PEOPLE
ARE EXCLUDED FROM
CANDIDATE DEBATES AND FORUMS!
THE POOR AND DISABLED ARE TIRED OF GOVERNMENT
BEING
OF THE RICH AND WEALTHY
AND BY THE RICH AND WEALTHY
AND FOR THE RICH WEALTHY!
Vermont Public Television, VPT, is funded in part by the
Annenberg Foundation,
which allegedly owns Factcheck.org
which allegedly promoted the campaign of Barack Hussein Obama
by posting a "Certification of Live Birth"
ALLEGING THAT WAS ADEQUATE EVIDENCE OF HIS CITIZENSHIP,
WHEN IN FACT,
DOESN'T IT ONLY PROVES REASONABLE DOUBT BECAUSE
IT IS NOT A
LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE? NATURAL BORN CITIZEN?
Vermont League of Cities and Towns allegedly created
an illegal and unregistered political action committee
and received member dues from cities and towns in Vermont,
all of which was 100% paid for by taxpayers, and an illegal
use of taxpayer money because Vermont League of Cities &
Towns then used those taxpayer funds to hold a 2008
Governor candidate debate at the
Killington Grand Resort Hotel, in which they refused to include
candidate Cris Ericson.
Title 18 United States Code, Section 241
Crimes and Criminal Procedure, Part I, Chapter 13 CIVIL RIGHTS
If two or more persons conspire to injure, OPPRESS, threaten, or
INTIMIDATE any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth,
Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any
right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of
the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same;
they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned...
United States Constitution Article XIV
14th Amendment
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States
and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the
United States and of the State wherein they reside.
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the
privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States;
nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or
property, without due process of law; NOR DENY TO ANY PERSON
WITHIN ITS JURISDICTION THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS.
POLL TAXES ARE ILLEGAL, THEREFORE,
SHOULD IT NOT ALSO
BE ILLEGAL
TO EXCLUDE ANY CANDIDATES WITHOUT CAMPAIGN BUDGETS
OR WITH SMALL CAMPAIGN BUDGETS
FROM DEBATES?
Debates are equivalent to job interviews so
to deny any candidate participation in any publicly
funded debate or forum,
paid for by taxpayer dollars,
is serious discrmination!
ISN'T EXCLUDING CANDIDATES WITH SMALL OR TINY
CAMPAIGN BUDGETS FROM DEBATES
THE SAME AS AN ILLEGAL POLL TAX?
Article XVI
The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes,
from whatever source derived, without apportionment among
the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.
WHEN TAXES ARE COLLECTED AND USED TO HOLD CANDIDATE DEBATES,
AND SOME CANDIDATES ARE EXCLUDED FROM PARTICIPATING IN THE DEBATES,
THEN ISN'T IT TRUE
THAT THE EXCLUDED CANDIDATES
HAVE BEEN DENIED EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS?
Did Deborah Markowitz, Vermont Secretary of State
with the members of the Coalition she joined in 2008,
exceed her authority and/or abuse her authority and/or
violate state and federal laws in the 2008 campaign season
and election because she used taxpayer funds
and her official office and the official SEAL of
her office to exclude 2008 gubernatorial candidate
Cris Ericson from participating in her Coalition
which promoted other candidates,
while excluding Cris Ericson?
Title 42 U.S.C. Section 1985
(1) If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire to
prevent, by force, INTIMIDATION, or threat, ANY PERSON from
ACCEPTING or holding office, trust, OR PLACE OF CONFIDENCE
under the United States...
QUESTION? Is being a political candidate a "place of confidence" and
is being excluded from a publicly funded candidate forum a form of
"intimidation"?
Is holding political office "employment"?
42 United States Code, Section 1981 EQUAL RIGHTS UNDER THE LAW
Section 1981a. Damages in cases of intentional discrmination in employment.
Section 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights.
Section 1985. Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights.
Section 1997h. Notice to Federal Departments.
42 U.S.C. Section 12201
Equal Opportunity for Individuals with Disabilities
IS BEING POOR A DISABILITY?
BEING POOR WAS THE CAUSE OF THE POLL TAX,
WHICH WAS OUT-LAWED.
42 U.S.C. Section 1973aa-1 Residence requirements for voting
(a) Congressional findings,
The Congress hereby finds that the imposition and application of the
durational residency requirement as a precondition to voting...
(5) has the effect of denying to citizens the equality of
civil rights, and due process and equal protection of the laws
that are guaranteed to them under the 14th amendment...
THEREFORE, BECAUSE 42 U.S.C. Section 1973aa-1 determined
that "EQUAL PROTECTION" DOES NOT MEAN JUST
IN REGARD TO RACE, NATIONAL ORIGIN, SEX, DISABILITY OR RELIGION,
"EQUAL PROTECTION" ALSO HAS BROADER DEFINITIONS!
Did Vermont Secretary of State,
Deborah Markowitz
VIOLATE THE INTENT OF THE VERMONT STATE LAWS,
INCLUDING:
17 V.S.A. SECTION 2810
17 V.S.A. SECTION 2811
17 V.S.A SECTION 2831
in conjunction with 17 V.S.A. Section 2851 (2) and
17 V.S.A. Section 2891 and 2892?
THIS IS THE NUMBER ONE
POLITICAL ISSUE IN VERMONT ! ! !
IT IS NOT LEGAL TO USE PUBLIC FUNDS
TO HOLD POLITICAL CANDIDATE DEBATES
AND TO EXCLUDE ANY CANDIDATE!
THE STATE OF VERMONT
IS A HOTBED OF CORRUPTION ! ! !
Ms. Cris Ericson suffered defeat in toxic tort litigation only after U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy took campaign donations from her opposing attorneys Political Action Committee, Dewey Ballantine PAC, which took money from her opposing attorneys who were employed by Dewey Ballantine, Wayne Cross and Stuart Hirshfield, as proven by Federal Election Commission public records!
U.S. SENATOR PATRICK LEAHY IS ALLEGEDLY TOTALLY CORRUPT!!!
Ms. Cris Ericson has 10 years of litigation experience in state and federal courts. U.S. Supreme Court Reports by Daniel A. Klein, LEXIS Publishing, 2001, Page 119, Cris Ericson, Petitioner v IDC Services, Inc., et al. 528 US, 146 L Ed 2d, 2000 US LEXIS 1560, 120 S Ct 1265. February 28, 2000. 94-4630(RMT) U.S.D.C. Los Angeles, 97 Civ 3081 (TPG) U.S.D.C./SDNY WestLaw and Federal Bankruptcy Law Reporter Ericson v In re IDC
THE PUBLISHED FEDERAL COURT OPINION BY JUDGE THOMAS P. GRIESA, IN STATEMENT OF FACTS, STATES THAT CRIS ERICSON WAS INJURED WITH PETN, LEAD AZIDE AND LEAD STYPHNATE.
These cases should be re-opened on the Supreme Court of the United States own motion, because after filing a complaint against state plan OSHA and bringing in federal OSHA, after Ms. Ericson's husband died, she finally received material safety data hazard sheets, which should have been provided before employee exposure, keeping in mind that neither she nor her now deceased husband ever received medical treatment, and once the evidence was in that there were in fact three toxic chemicals in the special effects used filming the motion picture "Point Break", then after that, all of her court papers were dismissed and denied.
THE COURTS ARE CORRUPT!
Cris Ericson was injured by celebrity actor Patrick Swayze with three federally regulated toxic, hazardous chemicals, one of which was lead azide, which is a carcinogen. Patrick Swayze is now reported in the news to be near death of cancer. Cris Ericson's husband was also exposed, and died of cancer.
Cris Ericson lost in court, after U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy took campaign donations from the Political Action Committee of her opposing attorneys, Wayne Cross and Stuart Hirshfield.
II.
"EPA denied the requested relief because the petition did not include sufficient information to provide a basis for the Agency to conclude that an unreasonable risk may exist"
THEN SEE THE CONTRADICTION
A.
"the health effects of lead and lead azide are well documented in the scientific literature. Lead azide is a skin and eye irritant, explosive, a carcinogen, and toxic to the lungs, kidneys, nervous system, blood and reproductive system... and even death...
THE CONTRADICTION IS ALARMING AND PROOF OF ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION!
U.S. SENATOR PATRICK LEAHY SHOULD BE IMPEACHED!
Lead Azide; Response to (Cris Ericson) Citizen's Petition Under TSCA Section 21
[Federal Register: April 15, 1997 (Volume 62, Number 72)]
[Notices]
[Page 18350-18352]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr15ap97_dat-53]
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[OPPTS-211043; FRL-5578-1]
Lead Azide; Response to Citizen's Petition Under TSCA Section 21
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Action: Notice; Denial of TSCA Section 21 Petition.
Summary: EPA received a petition under section 21 of the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA) on May 2, 1996, from a citizen requesting
that the Agency promulgate a regulation under TSCA section 6 that would
prohibit the manufacturing, processing, or distribution in commerce of
lead azide. The petitioner claims that she suffered injuries through
the use of lead azide to produce a ``special effect'' in filmmaking and
that manufacture of such substance should be prohibited to prevent
future human injury. EPA has evaluated the petition and upon further
consideration, denied it on July 31, 1996.
For Further Information Contact: Susan B. Hazen, Director,
Environmental Assistance Division (7408), Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW.,
Washington, DC 20460, Telephone: 202-260-1404, TDD: (202-554-0551), e-
mail: TSCA-Hotline@epa.mail.epa.gov.
...[[Page 18351]]
in commerce of a chemical substance. To issue a section 6 rule on a
chemical substance, EPA must find that a reasonable basis exists to
conclude that the manufacture, processing, distribution in commerce,
use or disposal of a chemical substance or mixture, or that any
combination of such activities, presents or will present an
unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment. TSCA section
6 requires EPA to apply the least burdensome requirement to protect
adequately against the risk.
This finding of unreasonable risk is a
judgement by EPA that the
risk of health
or environmental injury
from a
chemical substance or mixture outweighs
the burden to society
for
potential regulation.
OH! REALLY?
LEAD AZIDE IS A MAIN COMPONENT INGREDIENT OF "IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICES" USED BY TERRORISTS, AND MOVING IT IN COMMERCE UNDER THE GUISE OF "SPECIAL EFFECTS" ALLEGEDLY AIDS TERRORISM!
AFTER FILING A COMPLAINT AGAINST STATE OSHA, AND BRINGING IN FEDERAL OSHA, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE "SPECIAL EFFECTS" ALSO CONTAIN PETN PLASTIC HIGH EXPLOSIVES AND LEAD STYPHNATE, ALSO INGREDIENTS OF IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICES USED BY TERRORISTS.
PATRICK SWAYZE HAD HIS HANDS ON THE "SPECIAL EFFECTS" before he threw them at Cris Ericson, assaulting and battering her and injuring her with the exothermic decomposition products; and now he has DIED of cancer. Lead Azide is a carcinogen.
Will Patrick Swayze allegedly DID NOT warn and inform movie industry workers, before he died, about the truth about Lead Azide, PETN and Lead Styphnate! Did Patrick Swayze die with his deadly secret and have all of his assets & funds put in a trust controlled by his wife?
Lead Azide can cause cancer in a two hour industrial exposure. Cris Ericson's husband also worked on "Point Break" and was exposed to Lead Azide and died of cancer. Will he meet Patrick Swayze at Heaven's Gate?
U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy is allegedly corrupt, having taken political donations from attorneys for the movie industry in this case, Dewey Ballantine PAC, after Cris Ericson allegedly complained to the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee for Judicial violations of federal Labor Law 29 CFR 1910.1200 and failing to state in the published federal opinion that Lead Azide, Lead Styphnate and PETN are in fact federally regulated, toxic hazardous substances with reporting requirements which were not met.
The movie industry allegedly still abuses workers by exposing them to Lead Azide, Lead Styphnate and PETN which are all federally regulated toxic hazardous substances, under the fraudulent guise of "harmless special effects". When will the abuse and coverup end?
2010 Vote for Cris Ericson for Honesty in Government!
CRIS ERICSON 879 Church St., Chester, VT 05143.
NATURAL BORN CITIZEN?
BIRTHERS!
REQUEST NEW FEC RULE
REQUIRING ALL PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES
TO PROVIDE THEIR
ORIGINAL LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE!
http://www.fec.gov
TITLE 11 CFR (CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS) Section 105.3
Place of filing; Presidential candidates and their principal campaign
committees (2 U.S.C. 432(g)(4).
All designations, statements, reports, and notices, as well as any
modifications(s) or amendments(s) thereto, required to be filed
under 11 CFR parts 101, 102 and 104 by a candidate for nomination
for election or election to the office of President or Vice President
of the United States or by his or her principal campaign committee
shall be filed in ORIGINAL FORM with the FEDERAL ELECTION
COMMISSION.
11 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) Chapter 1, Subchapter A
Section 111.4
COMPLAINTS
[2 U.S.C. Section 437g(a)(1)]
(a) Any person who believes that a violation of any statute or
regulation over which the Commission has jurisdiction has occurred
or is about to occur may file a complaint in writing to the
General Counsel, Federal Election Commission, 999 E Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20463. If possible, three (3) copies
should be submitted.
(b) A complaint shall comply with the following:
(1) It shall provide the full name and address of the complainant ; and
(2) The contents of the complaint shall be sworn to and signed in the
presence of a notary public and shall be notarized.
The Federal Election Commission oversees all the money spent
in campaigns for federal office.
11 CFR Ch. 1 Part 101 Section 101.2 CANDIDATE AS AGENT
OF AUTHORIZED COMMITEE [2 U.S.C. Section 432(e)(2)]
QUESTION: BECAUSE THE CANDIDATE IS THE AUTHORIZED
AGENT OF THE COMMITTEE, THEN, THEREFORE,
SHOULD
THE DUTIES OF THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
INCLUDE DETERMINING IF EACH CANDIDATE FOR
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES IS IN FACT A
NATURAL BORN CITIZEN by providing their original
long form birth certificate?
11 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) Ch. 1, Subchapter B
Part 200
PETITIONS FOR RULEMAKING
11 CFR Ch.1, SubCh. B, Section 200.2 PROCEDURAL
REQUIREMENTS
(a) ANY INTERESTED PERSON MAY FILE WITH THE COMMISSION
A WRITTEN PETITION FOR THE ISSUANCE, AMENDMENT, OR
REPEAL OF A RULE IMPLEMENTING ANY OF THE FOLLOWING
STATUTES:
(1) The Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended, 2 U.S.C. 431 et seq.;
(2) The Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act, as amended, 26 U.S.C. 9001 et seq.;
(3) The Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act, as amended, 26 U.S.C. 9031
et seq.;
(4) The Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552; or
(5) Any other law that the Commission is required to implement and administer,
(b) THE PETITION SHALL
(1) Include the name and address of the Petitioner or Agent. An Authorized
Agent of the Petitioner may submit the Petition, but the Agent shall disclose
the identitify of this or her principal;
(2) Identify itself as a PETITION for the ISSUANCE, AMENDMENT, OR REPEAL of a rule;
(3) Identify the specific section(s) of the regulations to be affected;
(4) Set forth the factual and legal grounds on which the petitioner relies,
in support of the proposed action; and
(5) Be addressed and submitted to the
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL,
999 E STREET, NW., WASHINGTON, DC 20463.
(c) The petition may include draft regulatory language that would effectuate
the petitionser's proposal.
(d) The Commission may, in its discretion, treat a document that fails to
conform to the format requirements of paragraph (b) of this section as a basis for a
sua sponte rulemaking. For example, the Commission may consider whether to
intitiate a rulemaking project addressing issues raised in an advisory opinion request
submitted under 11 CFR 112.1 or in a complaint filed under 11 CFR 111.4. However, the
Commission need not follow the procedures of 11 CFR 200.3 in these instances.
REQUEST NEW FEC RULE
REQUIRING ALL PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES
TO PROVIDE THEIR
ORIGINAL LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE!
http://www.fec.gov
TITLE 11 CFR (CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS) Section 105.3
Place of filing; Presidential candidates and their principal campaign
committees (2 U.S.C. 432(g)(4).
All designations, statements, reports, and notices, as well as any
modifications(s) or amendments(s) thereto, required to be filed
under 11 CFR parts 101, 102 and 104 by a candidate for nomination
for election or election to the office of President or Vice President
of the United States or by his or her principal campaign committee
shall be filed in ORIGINAL FORM with the FEDERAL ELECTION
COMMISSION.
11 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) Chapter 1, Subchapter A
Section 111.4
COMPLAINTS
[2 U.S.C. Section 437g(a)(1)]
(a) Any person who believes that a violation of any statute or
regulation over which the Commission has jurisdiction has occurred
or is about to occur may file a complaint in writing to the
General Counsel, Federal Election Commission, 999 E Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20463. If possible, three (3) copies
should be submitted.
(b) A complaint shall comply with the following:
(1) It shall provide the full name and address of the complainant ; and
(2) The contents of the complaint shall be sworn to and signed in the
presence of a notary public and shall be notarized.
The Federal Election Commission oversees all the money spent
in campaigns for federal office.
11 CFR Ch. 1 Part 101 Section 101.2 CANDIDATE AS AGENT
OF AUTHORIZED COMMITEE [2 U.S.C. Section 432(e)(2)]
QUESTION: BECAUSE THE CANDIDATE IS THE AUTHORIZED
AGENT OF THE COMMITTEE, THEN, THEREFORE,
SHOULD
THE DUTIES OF THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
INCLUDE DETERMINING IF EACH CANDIDATE FOR
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES IS IN FACT A
NATURAL BORN CITIZEN by providing their original
long form birth certificate?
11 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) Ch. 1, Subchapter B
Part 200
PETITIONS FOR RULEMAKING
11 CFR Ch.1, SubCh. B, Section 200.2 PROCEDURAL
REQUIREMENTS
(a) ANY INTERESTED PERSON MAY FILE WITH THE COMMISSION
A WRITTEN PETITION FOR THE ISSUANCE, AMENDMENT, OR
REPEAL OF A RULE IMPLEMENTING ANY OF THE FOLLOWING
STATUTES:
(1) The Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended, 2 U.S.C. 431 et seq.;
(2) The Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act, as amended, 26 U.S.C. 9001 et seq.;
(3) The Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act, as amended, 26 U.S.C. 9031
et seq.;
(4) The Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552; or
(5) Any other law that the Commission is required to implement and administer,
(b) THE PETITION SHALL
(1) Include the name and address of the Petitioner or Agent. An Authorized
Agent of the Petitioner may submit the Petition, but the Agent shall disclose
the identitify of this or her principal;
(2) Identify itself as a PETITION for the ISSUANCE, AMENDMENT, OR REPEAL of a rule;
(3) Identify the specific section(s) of the regulations to be affected;
(4) Set forth the factual and legal grounds on which the petitioner relies,
in support of the proposed action; and
(5) Be addressed and submitted to the
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL,
999 E STREET, NW., WASHINGTON, DC 20463.
(c) The petition may include draft regulatory language that would effectuate
the petitionser's proposal.
(d) The Commission may, in its discretion, treat a document that fails to
conform to the format requirements of paragraph (b) of this section as a basis for a
sua sponte rulemaking. For example, the Commission may consider whether to
intitiate a rulemaking project addressing issues raised in an advisory opinion request
submitted under 11 CFR 112.1 or in a complaint filed under 11 CFR 111.4. However, the
Commission need not follow the procedures of 11 CFR 200.3 in these instances.
BIRTHERS! UNITE! REQUEST NEW FEC RULE REQUIRING LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE OF PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES!
BIRTHERS!
REQUEST NEW FEC RULE
REQUIRING ALL PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES
TO PROVIDE THEIR
ORIGINAL LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE!
http://www.fec.gov
TITLE 11 CFR (CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS) Section 105.3
Place of filing; Presidential candidates and their principal campaign
committees (2 U.S.C. 432(g)(4).
All designations, statements, reports, and notices, as well as any
modifications(s) or amendments(s) thereto, required to be filed
under 11 CFR parts 101, 102 and 104 by a candidate for nomination
for election or election to the office of President or Vice President
of the United States or by his or her principal campaign committee
shall be filed in ORIGINAL FORM with the FEDERAL ELECTION
COMMISSION.
11 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) Chapter 1, Subchapter A
Section 111.4
COMPLAINTS
[2 U.S.C. Section 437g(a)(1)]
(a) Any person who believes that a violation of any statute or
regulation over which the Commission has jurisdiction has occurred
or is about to occur may file a complaint in writing to the
General Counsel, Federal Election Commission, 999 E Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20463. If possible, three (3) copies
should be submitted.
(b) A complaint shall comply with the following:
(1) It shall provide the full name and address of the complainant ; and
(2) The contents of the complaint shall be sworn to and signed in the
presence of a notary public and shall be notarized.
The Federal Election Commission oversees all the money spent
in campaigns for federal office.
11 CFR Ch. 1 Part 101 Section 101.2 CANDIDATE AS AGENT
OF AUTHORIZED COMMITEE [2 U.S.C. Section 432(e)(2)]
QUESTION: BECAUSE THE CANDIDATE IS THE AUTHORIZED
AGENT OF THE COMMITTEE, THEN, THEREFORE,
SHOULD
THE DUTIES OF THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
INCLUDE DETERMINING IF EACH CANDIDATE FOR
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES IS IN FACT A
NATURAL BORN CITIZEN by providing their original
long form birth certificate?
11 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) Ch. 1, Subchapter B
Part 200
PETITIONS FOR RULEMAKING
11 CFR Ch.1, SubCh. B, Section 200.2 PROCEDURAL
REQUIREMENTS
(a) ANY INTERESTED PERSON MAY FILE WITH THE COMMISSION
A WRITTEN PETITION FOR THE ISSUANCE, AMENDMENT, OR
REPEAL OF A RULE IMPLEMENTING ANY OF THE FOLLOWING
STATUTES:
(1) The Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended, 2 U.S.C. 431 et seq.;
(2) The Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act, as amended, 26 U.S.C. 9001 et seq.;
(3) The Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act, as amended, 26 U.S.C. 9031
et seq.;
(4) The Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552; or
(5) Any other law that the Commission is required to implement and administer,
(b) THE PETITION SHALL
(1) Include the name and address of the Petitioner or Agent. An Authorized
Agent of the Petitioner may submit the Petition, but the Agent shall disclose
the identitify of this or her principal;
(2) Identify itself as a PETITION for the ISSUANCE, AMENDMENT, OR REPEAL of a rule;
(3) Identify the specific section(s) of the regulations to be affected;
(4) Set forth the factual and legal grounds on which the petitioner relies,
in support of the proposed action; and
(5) Be addressed and submitted to the
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL,
999 E STREET, NW., WASHINGTON, DC 20463.
(c) The petition may include draft regulatory language that would effectuate
the petitionser's proposal.
(d) The Commission may, in its discretion, treat a document that fails to
conform to the format requirements of paragraph (b) of this section as a basis for a
sua sponte rulemaking. For example, the Commission may consider whether to
intitiate a rulemaking project addressing issues raised in an advisory opinion request
submitted under 11 CFR 112.1 or in a complaint filed under 11 CFR 111.4. However, the
Commission need not follow the procedures of 11 CFR 200.3 in these instances.
REQUEST NEW FEC RULE
REQUIRING ALL PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES
TO PROVIDE THEIR
ORIGINAL LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE!
http://www.fec.gov
TITLE 11 CFR (CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS) Section 105.3
Place of filing; Presidential candidates and their principal campaign
committees (2 U.S.C. 432(g)(4).
All designations, statements, reports, and notices, as well as any
modifications(s) or amendments(s) thereto, required to be filed
under 11 CFR parts 101, 102 and 104 by a candidate for nomination
for election or election to the office of President or Vice President
of the United States or by his or her principal campaign committee
shall be filed in ORIGINAL FORM with the FEDERAL ELECTION
COMMISSION.
11 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) Chapter 1, Subchapter A
Section 111.4
COMPLAINTS
[2 U.S.C. Section 437g(a)(1)]
(a) Any person who believes that a violation of any statute or
regulation over which the Commission has jurisdiction has occurred
or is about to occur may file a complaint in writing to the
General Counsel, Federal Election Commission, 999 E Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20463. If possible, three (3) copies
should be submitted.
(b) A complaint shall comply with the following:
(1) It shall provide the full name and address of the complainant ; and
(2) The contents of the complaint shall be sworn to and signed in the
presence of a notary public and shall be notarized.
The Federal Election Commission oversees all the money spent
in campaigns for federal office.
11 CFR Ch. 1 Part 101 Section 101.2 CANDIDATE AS AGENT
OF AUTHORIZED COMMITEE [2 U.S.C. Section 432(e)(2)]
QUESTION: BECAUSE THE CANDIDATE IS THE AUTHORIZED
AGENT OF THE COMMITTEE, THEN, THEREFORE,
SHOULD
THE DUTIES OF THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
INCLUDE DETERMINING IF EACH CANDIDATE FOR
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES IS IN FACT A
NATURAL BORN CITIZEN by providing their original
long form birth certificate?
11 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) Ch. 1, Subchapter B
Part 200
PETITIONS FOR RULEMAKING
11 CFR Ch.1, SubCh. B, Section 200.2 PROCEDURAL
REQUIREMENTS
(a) ANY INTERESTED PERSON MAY FILE WITH THE COMMISSION
A WRITTEN PETITION FOR THE ISSUANCE, AMENDMENT, OR
REPEAL OF A RULE IMPLEMENTING ANY OF THE FOLLOWING
STATUTES:
(1) The Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended, 2 U.S.C. 431 et seq.;
(2) The Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act, as amended, 26 U.S.C. 9001 et seq.;
(3) The Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act, as amended, 26 U.S.C. 9031
et seq.;
(4) The Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552; or
(5) Any other law that the Commission is required to implement and administer,
(b) THE PETITION SHALL
(1) Include the name and address of the Petitioner or Agent. An Authorized
Agent of the Petitioner may submit the Petition, but the Agent shall disclose
the identitify of this or her principal;
(2) Identify itself as a PETITION for the ISSUANCE, AMENDMENT, OR REPEAL of a rule;
(3) Identify the specific section(s) of the regulations to be affected;
(4) Set forth the factual and legal grounds on which the petitioner relies,
in support of the proposed action; and
(5) Be addressed and submitted to the
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL,
999 E STREET, NW., WASHINGTON, DC 20463.
(c) The petition may include draft regulatory language that would effectuate
the petitionser's proposal.
(d) The Commission may, in its discretion, treat a document that fails to
conform to the format requirements of paragraph (b) of this section as a basis for a
sua sponte rulemaking. For example, the Commission may consider whether to
intitiate a rulemaking project addressing issues raised in an advisory opinion request
submitted under 11 CFR 112.1 or in a complaint filed under 11 CFR 111.4. However, the
Commission need not follow the procedures of 11 CFR 200.3 in these instances.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)